What Almost Was: A New Fenway Park

The proposed new Fenway Park that was close to being built across from the current Fenway

With the 100-year anniversary and celebration of Fenway Park’s opening set for tomorrow afternoon, I thought I’d let people know that Fenway Park was very close to being torn down about 10 years ago.

The following was taken from an article on www.ballparks.com

Location: Adjacent to the current Fenway Park and incorporating some of the existing structure. Home plate would be moved two hundred six yards directly behind its current location. Left field (N), Brookline Avenue and Yawkey Way; third base (W), Brookline Avenue and an extended Kilmamock Street; first base (S), Boylston Street; right field (E), a new alley.

Dimensions: The same as the current Fenway Park.

Fences: The same as the current Fenway Park.

A proposal for a replacement for Fenway Park, made by then team CEO John Harrington on May 15, 1999, had the Red Sox moving across Yawkey Way into a bigger, modern version of Fenway Park, similar in design to the retro-style ballparks of Camden Yards in Baltimore and Jacobs Field in Cleveland. It would have been built on 15.5 acres bounded by Yawkey Way, Brookline Avenue, and Boylston Street, retained the old field dimensions and made to look like Fenway.

The field would have faced the same direction and many of the landmarks beyond the old outfield walls would have been visible from the new park, such as the Citgo sign. Portions of the old ballpark would have been torn down eventually to make room for new development in what is now center field, the bleachers, and first-base side of the ballpark. But the plans also envision part of the old Fenway Park being turned into a baseball museum and park. The new plan would have allowed construction to take place while the Red Sox continued to play in Fenway Park.

Citing the economic obsolescence of Fenway Park as the reason, the Boston Red Sox wanted to be in a new stadium by 2003. Without the addition of 10,000 seats, including more luxury suites and other premium seats, the team said it would fall behind other teams in paying the player salaries needed to stay competitive on the field. The Red Sox were willing to pay the entire cost of a 44,130 seat replacement for Fenway Park, which was built in 1912 and seated 33,871 in 1999, but wanted public funds for such upgrades as improved transportation. The Red Sox were not considering selling private seat licenses in a new stadium and expected construction to cost about $350 million. In 1999, Massachusetts was the only state where there were four professional teams playing in privately financed facilities, so the Red Sox didn’t expect public funds to be available for the stadium.

Leading up to the announcement to build adjacent to Fenway Park, there were several sites discussed as a possible location for a new Red Sox ballpark. The team’s original preference was a site on the south side of Fort Point Channel near Summer Street which featured parking and proximity to mass transit. Another proposed location was the South Bay section of the Crossroads at Massachusetts Avenue site which straddled the Southeast Expressway. Both of these sites made headlines as possible locations of a proposed Megaplex which would have included a new Red Sox ballpark, a convention center and a domed stadium for the NFL’s New England Patriots. In the spring of 1996 a Hood dairy plant in Charlestown which was the property of one of the Red Sox owners was proposed as a site for a new ballpark. Later, there was discussion about refurbishing Fenway Park or rebuilding it on its current site. An organization called Save Fenway Park! was organized in 1998 to promote ways to preserve the old ballpark.

New Fenway Features:

  • The entrance to the new park would have been through what is now Yawkey Way, which would have been turned into a pedestrian walkway between the preserved sections of old Fenway and the main entrance to the new ballpark.
  • The new ballpark would have had about 35 percent more space and over 10,000 more seats. It would also have had 100 luxury boxes, at least 5,000 premium club seats, upgraded concession areas, wider seats and bigger aisles.
  • Restroom facilities would have been increased from eight for women and eleven for men to twenty-two for each.
  • The Red Sox had said there would be no corporate name attached to the new park.
  • Most of the characteristics and quirky dimensions of the playing field would have stayed the same, including the “Green Monster,” Pesky’s Pole, the center field triangle and the bullpens in front of the right field bleachers.
  • The 1912 Tapestry Wall along the Gate A entrance on Yawkey Way, the infield, a large portion of the “Green Monster” and the manual scoreboard would have been preserved where they stand. In that area, a Red Sox Baseball Museum, Hall of Fame, and children’s educational center would have been built.
  • The team considered putting a ladder on the new left field wall.
  • There would have been a red seat to commemorate where Ted Williams’ 502-foot homer would have landed in the new park.
  • Helen Robinson, switchboard operator since 1941, would have taken calls in the new park.”

So there you have it. Believe it or not, the Red Sox were once concerned about having enough money to pay players and stay competitive.  It is interesting to see that they wanted to be in a new stadium by 2003, which is the year that Red Sox began to catch on again, leading to the influx of “Pink Hats” that have since flooded money into the organization and will make sure that no-one over 5’2″ will ever be comfortable at a Red Sox game.


1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

One response to “What Almost Was: A New Fenway Park

  1. Kevin Smith

    Well, true, but I think it is best to keep it as a museum. However, Redsox needs a new stadium. Build a new ballpark somewhere else. Redsox could use both stadiums.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s